cursor-debate
Run a research-first, multi-perspective debate to explore complex technical decisions (trade-offs, architecture choices, integration strategies) using concrete codebase evidence. Use when the user asks to "debate" approaches, compare options, or needs a structured exploration before deciding.
소스 정보
- 저장소
- go-go-golems/docmgr
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 1월 2일 14:56
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 13
- 포크
- 4
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
파일 탐색기
2 개 파일SKILL.md 표시 중
SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기- name
- cursor-debate
- description
- Run a research-first, multi-perspective debate to explore complex technical decisions (trade-offs, architecture choices, integration strategies) using concrete codebase evidence. Use when the user asks to "debate" approaches, compare options, or needs a structured exploration before deciding.
# Cursor Debate
## Overview
Structure an evidence-based “debate round” to surface ideas and trade-offs; the debate does not decide, it informs the human decision-maker.
## Workflow
### 1) Define the question
- Write the precise decision question (1 sentence).
### 2) Choose candidates
- Include 3–6 perspectives total.
- Human personas (pragmatist, architect, researcher, integrator, tool builder)
- Optional “code entity” personas (actual modules/symbols), backed by real file evidence
### 3) Research first (required)
- For each candidate, list questions they need answered.
- Run concrete repo inspection (examples):
- `rg -n "..."`, `git grep`, `git log -p -- <path>`, `go test ./...`, etc.
- Record commands + key outputs in “Pre-Debate Research”.
### 4) Debate round
- Opening statements (Round 1)
- Rebuttals (Round 2)
- Moderator summary (tensions, trade-offs, open questions)
## Output template
Use the canonical outline in `references/debate.md`.
GitHub에서 보기