cursor-debate
Run a research-first, multi-perspective debate to explore complex technical decisions (trade-offs, architecture choices, integration strategies) using concrete codebase evidence. Use when the user asks to "debate" approaches, compare options, or needs a structured exploration before deciding.
来源信息
- 仓库
- go-go-golems/docmgr
- 最近来源活动
- 2026年1月2日 14:56
- 检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
- 英语
- 星标
- 13
- 分支
- 4
安装方式
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
检查来源文件
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
文件资源管理器
2 个文件正在显示 SKILL.md
SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览- name
- cursor-debate
- description
- Run a research-first, multi-perspective debate to explore complex technical decisions (trade-offs, architecture choices, integration strategies) using concrete codebase evidence. Use when the user asks to "debate" approaches, compare options, or needs a structured exploration before deciding.
# Cursor Debate
## Overview
Structure an evidence-based “debate round” to surface ideas and trade-offs; the debate does not decide, it informs the human decision-maker.
## Workflow
### 1) Define the question
- Write the precise decision question (1 sentence).
### 2) Choose candidates
- Include 3–6 perspectives total.
- Human personas (pragmatist, architect, researcher, integrator, tool builder)
- Optional “code entity” personas (actual modules/symbols), backed by real file evidence
### 3) Research first (required)
- For each candidate, list questions they need answered.
- Run concrete repo inspection (examples):
- `rg -n "..."`, `git grep`, `git log -p -- <path>`, `go test ./...`, etc.
- Record commands + key outputs in “Pre-Debate Research”.
### 4) Debate round
- Opening statements (Round 1)
- Rebuttals (Round 2)
- Moderator summary (tensions, trade-offs, open questions)
## Output template
Use the canonical outline in `references/debate.md`.
在 GitHub 查看