yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 20

seed-selection

Validate and prioritize starting papers for snowball surveys. Evaluates which seeds will yield the richest citation traces based on citation count, recency, and network position.

selection-from-frontier

Select the final portfolio from the Pareto front by applying stakeholder preferences and decision criteria.

sensitivity-analysis-design

Design leave-one-out, influence diagnostics, subgroup analyses, and robustness checks

sensitivity-ranking

Rank constraints by sensitivity — which ones most impact the outcome if they shift

sensitivity-synthesis

Synthesize all sensitivity analysis results into a coherent report with prioritized recommendations.

separation-principle

Apply time/space/condition/scale separation to resolve physical contradictions where the same parameter must satisfy opposing requirements.

severity-scoring

Rate failure mode severity 1-10 based on end-effect impact. Follows AIAG-VDA severity scale calibrated for research artifacts.

single-factor-removal

Remove one specified factor from the artifact's support structure and reason about how the conclusion changes.

six-hats-ideation

Green Hat focused creative thinking within Six Hats framework

snowball

Citation-chain-driven literature survey starting from seed papers. Traces research lineage in both forward (who cited this) and backward (what this cited) directions until saturation. High deep-read ratio (67%). Use when the user already has key papers and…

sobol-decomposition

Sobol variance decomposition — compute first-order and total-order sensitivity indices for precise variance attribution.

society-of-mind

Strategy: Multi-agent collaborative debate based on Du et al. Society of Mind. Agents share perspectives iteratively until convergence or divergence is detected.

socratic-probing

Apply 6 types of Socratic questions to test claims and assumptions. Exposes weaknesses and strengthens reasoning.

solution-space-reduction

Apply CCA to remove inconsistent combinations

springboard-launch

Convert analogy insights into concrete feasible solutions. Transform abstract connections into actionable mechanisms.

staged-gate-evaluation

Define gate criteria for each stage, evaluate candidates at each gate, and render go/kill/recycle decisions with evidence.

stakeholder-confirmation

Simulate stakeholder perspectives to validate gap priorities. Assesses gap value from researcher, practitioner, funder, and end-user viewpoints.

stakeholder-mapping

Map all affected parties using CSH 12-question framework, identify jobs-to-be-done, classify by salience. Reveals whose perspective is systematically excluded.

stakeholder-objection-simulation

Simulate stakeholder objections through role-play and political feasibility analysis to test whether the decision survives real-world opposition.

stakeholder-simulation

Simulate user/engineer/investor/regulator/society perspectives to surface hidden requirements and opportunities.

stakeholder-weighted-ranking

Strategy: Weight by stakeholder perspective — the same gap carries different weight under different perspectives; take the consensus ranking at the end

statistical-method-selection

Select appropriate statistical methods for experiment analysis

steel-manning-synthesis

Synthesize all attacks and verdicts into a final unified assessment with surviving concerns and recommended modifications.

stepping-stone

Use impractical ideas as stepping stones to reach practical solutions (de Bono Stepping Stone technique).

strategy-robustness-testing

Orchestrates impact assessment and robustness scoring to evaluate research approach resilience across scenarios

strength-assessment

Tactic for assessing argument strength — evaluate evidence quality, count independent sources, check for defeaters, assign calibrated confidence scores.

stress-scenario

What is the worst case? — Extreme condition construction and failure mode enumeration for risk preparedness

structural-counterfactual

Strategy: Pearl Three-Step counterfactual — Abduction (fit model to evidence), Action (intervene on factor), Prediction (derive counterfactual outcome).

structural-mapping

Map source→target structural correspondences. Identifies corresponding, missing, and extra elements between domains.

structural-synthesis

Synthesize all structural transformation outputs into a coherent, ranked idea report with lineage tracking.

structured-attack-campaign

Tactic: Full attack lifecycle — threat surface enumeration, attack vector generation, systematic probing, and finding aggregation across all surfaces.

sub-question-decomposition

Tactic: Decompose a main question into a hierarchy of independently answerable sub-questions

sufficiency-evaluation

Evaluate the probability of sufficiency (PS) for a causal factor — would this factor alone be enough to produce the conclusion?

surgery-operation

Execute component surgery operations (subtract/multiply/divide/unify/redirect) from Systematic Inventive Thinking.

survey-synthesis

Final synthesis step — weave all gathered evidence (reading notes, extracted data, categorizations) into a coherent structured output appropriate to the strategy type. Used by all 5 strategies as the final step.

symbolic-analogy

Compress core contradiction into poetic imagery/oxymoron. Use compressed conflicts to reveal hidden solution directions.

symbolic-compression

Compress problem contradiction into 2-3 word oxymoron. Produces oxymorons with interpretation directions for each.

synectics-synthesis

Synthesize all synectics outputs into a structured idea report. Combines results from all analogy types and excursion processes.

systematic-factor-ablation

Tactic: List all factors, remove one at a time, assess conclusion stability, rank factors by load-bearing importance.

systematic-perturbation

Multi-axis systematic perturbation — define variation axes, perturb along each, measure degradation, construct validity envelope.