Skip to main content

strategic-retreat-decision

Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
baojie/shiji-kb
Última actividad en el origen
25 de marzo de 2026 a las 08:27
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
3339
Forks
528

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
strategic-retreat-decision
description
Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.
# Strategic Retreat Decision Framework A decision-making process for balancing honor against tactical advantage in warfare. ## Overview When facing an enemy with whom you have a past agreement, use this framework to decide whether to advance or retreat. ## Decision Criteria ### Honor-Based Considerations - Past verbal agreements or promises made - Reputation for keeping one's word - Long-term trust with other states - Moral standing among allies ### Tactical Considerations - Current military position - Enemy strength and morale - Terrain advantages - Strategic objectives ## Decision Process 1. **Recall Past Agreements**: Review any promises made to the opposing party 2. **Assess Current Situation**: Evaluate military position and odds of victory 3. **Weigh Long-term Impact**: Consider reputation vs. immediate gain 4. **Make Decision**: - If agreement exists and honor is paramount → Retreat as promised - If no agreement or honor already compromised → Pursue tactical advantage 5. **Document Reasoning**: Record decision rationale for future reference ## Example Application When Duke Wen faced Chu forces, he retreated three stages (三舍) as promised during his exile, despite tactical advantage. This demonstrated honor and built long-term credibility. ## Expected Outcome A decision that balances immediate military needs with long-term reputation and alliance maintenance. ## Verification 1. Confirm that all past agreements with the opposing party have been reviewed and documented before making the advance/retreat decision. 2. Validate that the long-term reputational impact has been weighed against the immediate tactical gain. 3. Check that the decision rationale is recorded for future reference and alliance credibility.
Ver en GitHub