Skip to main content

strategic-retreat-decision

Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
baojie/shiji-kb
Letzte Quellaktivität
25. März 2026 um 08:27
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
3.339
Forks
528

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
strategic-retreat-decision
description
Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.
# Strategic Retreat Decision Framework A decision-making process for balancing honor against tactical advantage in warfare. ## Overview When facing an enemy with whom you have a past agreement, use this framework to decide whether to advance or retreat. ## Decision Criteria ### Honor-Based Considerations - Past verbal agreements or promises made - Reputation for keeping one's word - Long-term trust with other states - Moral standing among allies ### Tactical Considerations - Current military position - Enemy strength and morale - Terrain advantages - Strategic objectives ## Decision Process 1. **Recall Past Agreements**: Review any promises made to the opposing party 2. **Assess Current Situation**: Evaluate military position and odds of victory 3. **Weigh Long-term Impact**: Consider reputation vs. immediate gain 4. **Make Decision**: - If agreement exists and honor is paramount → Retreat as promised - If no agreement or honor already compromised → Pursue tactical advantage 5. **Document Reasoning**: Record decision rationale for future reference ## Example Application When Duke Wen faced Chu forces, he retreated three stages (三舍) as promised during his exile, despite tactical advantage. This demonstrated honor and built long-term credibility. ## Expected Outcome A decision that balances immediate military needs with long-term reputation and alliance maintenance. ## Verification 1. Confirm that all past agreements with the opposing party have been reviewed and documented before making the advance/retreat decision. 2. Validate that the long-term reputational impact has been weighed against the immediate tactical gain. 3. Check that the decision rationale is recorded for future reference and alliance credibility.
Auf GitHub ansehen