Skip to main content

strategic-retreat-decision

Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
baojie/shiji-kb
Dernière activité de la source
25 mars 2026 à 08:27
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
3 339
Forks
528

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
2 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
strategic-retreat-decision
description
Use when balancing honor-based commitments against tactical military advantage. Applies Duke Wen's three-stage retreat (三舍) framework: recalling past agreements, assessing current position, weighing long-term reputation versus immediate gains, and documenting decision rationale.
# Strategic Retreat Decision Framework A decision-making process for balancing honor against tactical advantage in warfare. ## Overview When facing an enemy with whom you have a past agreement, use this framework to decide whether to advance or retreat. ## Decision Criteria ### Honor-Based Considerations - Past verbal agreements or promises made - Reputation for keeping one's word - Long-term trust with other states - Moral standing among allies ### Tactical Considerations - Current military position - Enemy strength and morale - Terrain advantages - Strategic objectives ## Decision Process 1. **Recall Past Agreements**: Review any promises made to the opposing party 2. **Assess Current Situation**: Evaluate military position and odds of victory 3. **Weigh Long-term Impact**: Consider reputation vs. immediate gain 4. **Make Decision**: - If agreement exists and honor is paramount → Retreat as promised - If no agreement or honor already compromised → Pursue tactical advantage 5. **Document Reasoning**: Record decision rationale for future reference ## Example Application When Duke Wen faced Chu forces, he retreated three stages (三舍) as promised during his exile, despite tactical advantage. This demonstrated honor and built long-term credibility. ## Expected Outcome A decision that balances immediate military needs with long-term reputation and alliance maintenance. ## Verification 1. Confirm that all past agreements with the opposing party have been reviewed and documented before making the advance/retreat decision. 2. Validate that the long-term reputational impact has been weighed against the immediate tactical gain. 3. Check that the decision rationale is recorded for future reference and alliance credibility.
Voir sur GitHub