Menu
Use when designing engagement surveys, pulse surveys, or listening systems — covers question selection, cadence, anonymity, and closing the loop.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Use when designing or applying progressive discipline — covers the escalating sequence, documentation, gross misconduct exceptions, and consistency.
Use when conducting or scoping workplace investigations — covers intake, scope, interview protocols, evidence, findings, and outcomes.
Use when auditing or designing the candidate's journey — covers communication, time, transparency, and the link between candidate experience and employer brand.
Use when designing career frameworks, level rubrics, IC and management track parity, and promotion processes.
Use when planning organizational change — covers communication architecture, sequencing, manager enablement, and predictable failure modes.
Use when training managers in coaching skills — covers GROW, listening, asking vs. telling, and growth mindset framing.
| name | engagement-survey-design |
| description | Use when designing engagement surveys, pulse surveys, or listening systems — covers question selection, cadence, anonymity, and closing the loop. |
A survey is a tool. A listening system is the practice of asking the right questions, at the right cadence, with protections that make truth-telling safe, interpreting honestly, acting on findings, and closing the loop.
Vendors sell surveys. Consultants build listening systems.
| Cadence | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Annual full-engagement | Comprehensive read; benchmarking; trend |
| Pulse (quarterly) | Track key metrics between annuals |
| Onboarding (Day 7/30/90/365) | New hire experience |
| Exit | Why people leave |
| Stay | Why people stay or might leave (predictive) |
Always-on sentiment monitoring (passive Slack analysis, etc.) is increasingly available. Default position: skeptical. Surveillance frames feel different from listening.
Avoid: vendor-default 60-item bank; generic "I have a best friend at work"; aspirational items nobody could disagree with.
Prefer: questions tied to outcomes the company can act on.
Core constructs to consider:
Edmondson's psychological safety items (paraphrased):
Targets:
Look for:
Be cautious about:
The single biggest predictor of program longevity:
Skipping step 3 or 4 destroys the program faster than anything else.
At scale, team-level results enable manager accountability:
Watch for: managers who pressure their team to score them well destroy the signal.
engagement-researcher agentpsychological-safety skillinclusion-belonging skillculture-articulation skill