菜单
Use when designing engagement surveys, pulse surveys, or listening systems — covers question selection, cadence, anonymity, and closing the loop.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when designing or applying progressive discipline — covers the escalating sequence, documentation, gross misconduct exceptions, and consistency.
Use when conducting or scoping workplace investigations — covers intake, scope, interview protocols, evidence, findings, and outcomes.
Use when auditing or designing the candidate's journey — covers communication, time, transparency, and the link between candidate experience and employer brand.
Use when designing career frameworks, level rubrics, IC and management track parity, and promotion processes.
Use when planning organizational change — covers communication architecture, sequencing, manager enablement, and predictable failure modes.
Use when training managers in coaching skills — covers GROW, listening, asking vs. telling, and growth mindset framing.
| name | engagement-survey-design |
| description | Use when designing engagement surveys, pulse surveys, or listening systems — covers question selection, cadence, anonymity, and closing the loop. |
A survey is a tool. A listening system is the practice of asking the right questions, at the right cadence, with protections that make truth-telling safe, interpreting honestly, acting on findings, and closing the loop.
Vendors sell surveys. Consultants build listening systems.
| Cadence | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Annual full-engagement | Comprehensive read; benchmarking; trend |
| Pulse (quarterly) | Track key metrics between annuals |
| Onboarding (Day 7/30/90/365) | New hire experience |
| Exit | Why people leave |
| Stay | Why people stay or might leave (predictive) |
Always-on sentiment monitoring (passive Slack analysis, etc.) is increasingly available. Default position: skeptical. Surveillance frames feel different from listening.
Avoid: vendor-default 60-item bank; generic "I have a best friend at work"; aspirational items nobody could disagree with.
Prefer: questions tied to outcomes the company can act on.
Core constructs to consider:
Edmondson's psychological safety items (paraphrased):
Targets:
Look for:
Be cautious about:
The single biggest predictor of program longevity:
Skipping step 3 or 4 destroys the program faster than anything else.
At scale, team-level results enable manager accountability:
Watch for: managers who pressure their team to score them well destroy the signal.
engagement-researcher agentpsychological-safety skillinclusion-belonging skillculture-articulation skill