Skip to main content

audit

Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.

Informations de source

Dépôt
ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins
Dernière activité de la source
15 mai 2026 à 23:45
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
990
Forks
808

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
audit
description
Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.
# Audit Standalone multi-level code review. Dispatcher — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier). Workers — Sonnet 4.6. ## Inputs - **Target** — file path, line range, commit SHA, branch, or PR number provided by the user - **Default (no target)** — `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged` - **Level flag** — `--level 1` through `--level 5` (default — L2) ## Review Levels Adapted from [review-levels.md](../hyperflow/review-levels.md): | L | Name | Checks | |---|------|--------| | 1 | Quick | Syntax, obvious bugs, formatting | | 2 | Standard | L1 + spec compliance, naming, edge cases | | 3 | Thorough | L2 + cross-file consistency, integration risks, security | | 4 | Deep | L3 + architecture, scalability, accessibility | | 5 | Exhaustive | L4 + adversarial probing, perf profiling, alternatives | Security scan (hardcoded secrets, injection, path traversal, XSS, missing validation) is mandatory at L3+. See [security.md](../hyperflow/security.md). ## Flow 1. Resolve scope — use provided target or run `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged`. 2. Dispatch `Searcher — gathering context for review` (Sonnet 4.6) to map referenced files and load relevant project context. 3. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — reviewing <scope> at level L<n>` — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier, non-negotiable). 4. Reviewer uses [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md) template with the diff, level definition, and any applicable spec. 5. Aggregate findings into structured output (see below). 6. Append durable patterns/gotchas to `.hyperflow/memory/learnings.md` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). If any security issue found → emit `SECURITY_VIOLATION:` halt marker immediately. ## Output Format ``` ── Review Result ────────────────────── Scope: <files / range / commit> Level: L<n> Verdict: PASS | NEEDS_FIX | SECURITY_VIOLATION [Critical] - file:line — issue + required fix [Important] - file:line — issue + recommended fix [Suggestions] - file:line — optional improvement [Praise] - file:line — what's done well ─────────────────────────────────────── Agents: 1 searcher (sonnet) · 1 reviewer (opus) ``` ## Hand-off (no auto-chain) - **PASS** — suggest `/hyperflow:deploy` if the user is ready to release. Do not auto-ship. - **NEEDS_FIX** — print the finding list and suggest `/hyperflow:trace` (for root-cause bugs) or manual edits. Do not auto-fix. - **SECURITY_VIOLATION** — halt; do not transition. User decides remediation path. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). Output style in [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md).
Voir sur GitHub