Skip to main content

audit

Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.

소스 정보

저장소
ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins
최근 소스 활동
2026년 5월 15일 23:45
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
968
포크
639

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
audit
description
Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.
# Audit Standalone multi-level code review. Dispatcher — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier). Workers — Sonnet 4.6. ## Inputs - **Target** — file path, line range, commit SHA, branch, or PR number provided by the user - **Default (no target)** — `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged` - **Level flag** — `--level 1` through `--level 5` (default — L2) ## Review Levels Adapted from [review-levels.md](../hyperflow/review-levels.md): | L | Name | Checks | |---|------|--------| | 1 | Quick | Syntax, obvious bugs, formatting | | 2 | Standard | L1 + spec compliance, naming, edge cases | | 3 | Thorough | L2 + cross-file consistency, integration risks, security | | 4 | Deep | L3 + architecture, scalability, accessibility | | 5 | Exhaustive | L4 + adversarial probing, perf profiling, alternatives | Security scan (hardcoded secrets, injection, path traversal, XSS, missing validation) is mandatory at L3+. See [security.md](../hyperflow/security.md). ## Flow 1. Resolve scope — use provided target or run `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged`. 2. Dispatch `Searcher — gathering context for review` (Sonnet 4.6) to map referenced files and load relevant project context. 3. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — reviewing <scope> at level L<n>` — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier, non-negotiable). 4. Reviewer uses [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md) template with the diff, level definition, and any applicable spec. 5. Aggregate findings into structured output (see below). 6. Append durable patterns/gotchas to `.hyperflow/memory/learnings.md` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). If any security issue found → emit `SECURITY_VIOLATION:` halt marker immediately. ## Output Format ``` ── Review Result ────────────────────── Scope: <files / range / commit> Level: L<n> Verdict: PASS | NEEDS_FIX | SECURITY_VIOLATION [Critical] - file:line — issue + required fix [Important] - file:line — issue + recommended fix [Suggestions] - file:line — optional improvement [Praise] - file:line — what's done well ─────────────────────────────────────── Agents: 1 searcher (sonnet) · 1 reviewer (opus) ``` ## Hand-off (no auto-chain) - **PASS** — suggest `/hyperflow:deploy` if the user is ready to release. Do not auto-ship. - **NEEDS_FIX** — print the finding list and suggest `/hyperflow:trace` (for root-cause bugs) or manual edits. Do not auto-fix. - **SECURITY_VIOLATION** — halt; do not transition. User decides remediation path. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). Output style in [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md).
GitHub에서 보기