Skip to main content

audit

Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.

Quellinformationen

Repository
ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins
Letzte Quellaktivität
15. Mai 2026 um 23:45
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
968
Forks
639

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
audit
description
Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.
# Audit Standalone multi-level code review. Dispatcher — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier). Workers — Sonnet 4.6. ## Inputs - **Target** — file path, line range, commit SHA, branch, or PR number provided by the user - **Default (no target)** — `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged` - **Level flag** — `--level 1` through `--level 5` (default — L2) ## Review Levels Adapted from [review-levels.md](../hyperflow/review-levels.md): | L | Name | Checks | |---|------|--------| | 1 | Quick | Syntax, obvious bugs, formatting | | 2 | Standard | L1 + spec compliance, naming, edge cases | | 3 | Thorough | L2 + cross-file consistency, integration risks, security | | 4 | Deep | L3 + architecture, scalability, accessibility | | 5 | Exhaustive | L4 + adversarial probing, perf profiling, alternatives | Security scan (hardcoded secrets, injection, path traversal, XSS, missing validation) is mandatory at L3+. See [security.md](../hyperflow/security.md). ## Flow 1. Resolve scope — use provided target or run `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged`. 2. Dispatch `Searcher — gathering context for review` (Sonnet 4.6) to map referenced files and load relevant project context. 3. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — reviewing <scope> at level L<n>` — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier, non-negotiable). 4. Reviewer uses [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md) template with the diff, level definition, and any applicable spec. 5. Aggregate findings into structured output (see below). 6. Append durable patterns/gotchas to `.hyperflow/memory/learnings.md` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). If any security issue found → emit `SECURITY_VIOLATION:` halt marker immediately. ## Output Format ``` ── Review Result ────────────────────── Scope: <files / range / commit> Level: L<n> Verdict: PASS | NEEDS_FIX | SECURITY_VIOLATION [Critical] - file:line — issue + required fix [Important] - file:line — issue + recommended fix [Suggestions] - file:line — optional improvement [Praise] - file:line — what's done well ─────────────────────────────────────── Agents: 1 searcher (sonnet) · 1 reviewer (opus) ``` ## Hand-off (no auto-chain) - **PASS** — suggest `/hyperflow:deploy` if the user is ready to release. Do not auto-ship. - **NEEDS_FIX** — print the finding list and suggest `/hyperflow:trace` (for root-cause bugs) or manual edits. Do not auto-fix. - **SECURITY_VIOLATION** — halt; do not transition. User decides remediation path. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). Output style in [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md).
Auf GitHub ansehen