Skip to main content

audit

Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
ccplugins/awesome-claude-code-plugins
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年5月15日 23:45
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
968
フォーク
639

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
audit
description
Use when the user asks for a code review, "review this change", "review my PR", "review the diff", or wants quality/spec/security/perf feedback on recent changes. Triggers a multi-level review with a thinking-tier reviewer agent. Standalone — does not auto-chain.
# Audit Standalone multi-level code review. Dispatcher — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier). Workers — Sonnet 4.6. ## Inputs - **Target** — file path, line range, commit SHA, branch, or PR number provided by the user - **Default (no target)** — `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged` - **Level flag** — `--level 1` through `--level 5` (default — L2) ## Review Levels Adapted from [review-levels.md](../hyperflow/review-levels.md): | L | Name | Checks | |---|------|--------| | 1 | Quick | Syntax, obvious bugs, formatting | | 2 | Standard | L1 + spec compliance, naming, edge cases | | 3 | Thorough | L2 + cross-file consistency, integration risks, security | | 4 | Deep | L3 + architecture, scalability, accessibility | | 5 | Exhaustive | L4 + adversarial probing, perf profiling, alternatives | Security scan (hardcoded secrets, injection, path traversal, XSS, missing validation) is mandatory at L3+. See [security.md](../hyperflow/security.md). ## Flow 1. Resolve scope — use provided target or run `git diff HEAD` + `git diff --staged`. 2. Dispatch `Searcher — gathering context for review` (Sonnet 4.6) to map referenced files and load relevant project context. 3. Dispatch `**Reviewer** — reviewing <scope> at level L<n>` — Opus 4.7 (thinking-tier, non-negotiable). 4. Reviewer uses [reviewer-prompt.md](../hyperflow/reviewer-prompt.md) template with the diff, level definition, and any applicable spec. 5. Aggregate findings into structured output (see below). 6. Append durable patterns/gotchas to `.hyperflow/memory/learnings.md` per [memory-system.md](../hyperflow/memory-system.md). If any security issue found → emit `SECURITY_VIOLATION:` halt marker immediately. ## Output Format ``` ── Review Result ────────────────────── Scope: <files / range / commit> Level: L<n> Verdict: PASS | NEEDS_FIX | SECURITY_VIOLATION [Critical] - file:line — issue + required fix [Important] - file:line — issue + recommended fix [Suggestions] - file:line — optional improvement [Praise] - file:line — what's done well ─────────────────────────────────────── Agents: 1 searcher (sonnet) · 1 reviewer (opus) ``` ## Hand-off (no auto-chain) - **PASS** — suggest `/hyperflow:deploy` if the user is ready to release. Do not auto-ship. - **NEEDS_FIX** — print the finding list and suggest `/hyperflow:trace` (for root-cause bugs) or manual edits. Do not auto-fix. - **SECURITY_VIOLATION** — halt; do not transition. User decides remediation path. ## Doctrine Full rules in [DOCTRINE.md](../hyperflow/DOCTRINE.md). Output style in [output-style.md](../hyperflow/output-style.md).
GitHubで見る