Skip to main content

studio-archetype-selector

Helps the studio operator choose between the 3 studio archetypes from govclab: In-house, External partnership, Hybrid. Brief edge-case skill — usually embedded in studio-thesis setup but available standalone when archetype decision is the primary question. Use when the user asks "studio archetype", "in-house vs external", "venture builder model", "hybrid studio", "/studio-archetype-selector".

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
DojoCodingLabs/venture-studio-toolkit
Letzte Quellaktivität
14. April 2026 um 22:35
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Mehrsprachig
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
studio-archetype-selector
version
1.0.0
description
Helps the studio operator choose between the 3 studio archetypes from govclab: In-house, External partnership, Hybrid. Brief edge-case skill — usually embedded in studio-thesis setup but available standalone when archetype decision is the primary question. Use when the user asks "studio archetype", "in-house vs external", "venture builder model", "hybrid studio", "/studio-archetype-selector".
# Studio Archetype Selector Ayuda al operador a elegir entre los **3 archetypes de venture studio** identificados por govclab. ## Regla de idioma Español. ## Directorio de salida ``` ./portfolio/{studio-name}/ └── archetype-decision.md ``` --- ## Los 3 archetypes (govclab) ### 1. In-house Studio **Definición**: el studio crea startups internamente usando domain expertise propia. Founding team sale del studio, ventures nacen dentro y luego se spin-out. **Ejemplos**: BCG Digital Ventures, Atomic (founded by Bill Gross), Rocket Internet. **Fit**: cuando el studio tiene deep vertical expertise y puede identificar opportunities desde insider knowledge. **Pros**: - Control total sobre ideation - Cultura consistente - IP capture clean (todo es del studio inicialmente) - Team stability (GPs know each other) **Cons**: - Hiring caro (buscar founders externos pagos) - Scale limited por GP bandwidth - Group-think risk (todos piensan igual) ### 2. External Partnership **Definición**: el studio co-crea con entrepreneurs externos que tienen ideas pero necesitan capital + infrastructure del studio. **Ejemplos**: Founders Factory, betaworks, Highbeam. **Fit**: cuando el studio quiere scale without hiring founders, y tiene network strong para atraer entrepreneurs. **Pros**: - Entrepreneurs bring own ideas + drive - Scale via partnership velocity - Diverse thought (no group-think) - Studio stake via partnership terms **Cons**: - Less control sobre thesis alignment - Partnership terms disputes - IP questions más complejos - Entrepreneur retention risk ### 3. Hybrid **Definición**: mezcla — el studio hace both. Algunas ventures nacen in-house, otras vienen de external partnerships. **Ejemplos**: Human Ventures, Prehype, Expa. **Fit**: cuando el studio ya maduró y quiere max optionality. **Pros**: - Diversify deal flow - Learn from both models - Flexible strategy **Cons**: - Más complejo operacionalmente - Requiere both skill sets - Thesis puede diluirse --- ## Flujo del skill (5 preguntas) **SA-1**: "¿Cuál describe mejor al team del studio hoy? - (a) Domain experts — conocemos el sector profundamente, tenemos insights únicos - (b) Network operators — tenemos network strong, acceso a talent y deal flow - (c) Both — experts Y networkers" **SA-2**: "¿Cómo querés generar ideas de venture? - (a) Internalmente, basadas en research propia + insights del studio - (b) Externamente, entrepreneurs nos vienen con ideas - (c) Both, según oportunidad" **SA-3**: "¿Qué velocity de launch esperás? - (a) 1-3 ventures/año (in-house tempo) - (b) 5-10 ventures/año (partnership tempo) - (c) Flexibilidad" **SA-4**: "¿El studio tiene capital enough para hiring founders internos? - Yes → In-house viable - No → External partnership es casi mandatory - Mixed → Hybrid" **SA-5**: "¿Tu track record de Secret Sauce se basa más en? - (a) Haber operado startups tú mismo/a - (b) Haber network strong + deals access - (c) Ambos" ### Scoring Más (a)s → **In-house** Más (b)s → **External Partnership** Mix → **Hybrid** --- ## Output ```markdown # Studio Archetype Decision — [Studio Name] ## Responses [Table with 5 questions + answers] ## Recommended archetype **[In-house / External Partnership / Hybrid]** ## Rationale [Based on responses + studio context] ## Implications Structure impact: - [In-house]: Management Co centralized + founders on payroll - [External]: Partnership agreement templates needed - [Hybrid]: Both setups; más complexity Hiring impact: - [In-house]: Need to recruit N founders/year - [External]: Need deal flow + evaluation pipeline Thesis impact: - [In-house]: Tight thesis viable - [External]: Thesis loose but clear criteria ## Next steps 1. [Specific actions per archetype] ``` --- ## Principios clave - **Archetype NO es permanente**: most studios evolve from one to another over time - **Hybrid mid-stage is natural**: most successful studios end up hybrid after 2-3 years - **In-house requires capital intensive**: salaries + benefits + runway - **External requires network + reputation**: without those, entrepreneurs don't apply ## Integración con otras skills - **`studio-thesis`**: archetype informa thesis structure - **`studio-focus`**: in-house can be tighter focus; external más flexible - **`vertical-charter`**: verticals pueden usar diferentes archetypes dentro del mismo studio ## Recursos - **Govclab** — [How to build a venture studio](https://govclab.com/2023/04/25/how-to-build-a-venture-studio/) - **GSSN (Global Startup Studio Network)** — industry data sobre archetypes
Auf GitHub ansehen